Posted  by  admin

Dustin Curtis On Twitter: New Twitter For Mac

Dustin Curtis On Twitter: New Twitter For Mac Average ratng: 7,4/10 2272 votes

One thing is for sure – we wouldn’t be able to build the products and features that we do if it weren’t for the input of product managers across different industries. While there’s no shortage of lists of great product managers to follow, our spin is going to be a little bit different.

It won’t have and it won’t be voted on by a large group. What it will be is an ever-growing list from verifiably incredible people who get shit done. Have one that we should add?

Hit up the comments. So without further ado, here is the FullContact Living List of Product Managers. Oh, and if you want to save a little time, you can just after you skim the blog post. Hunter Walk Hunter’s combination of “aw shucks” truisms and genuine insight on investments and business ideas all add up to a great account to follow whether you’re just looking for product management, or more inclined toward business in general. Being a startup VC is hard. Being a startup founder is even harder.

But damn it's fun when things come together. — Hunter Walk (@hunterwalk) On the product front, his shared experiences are invaluable. He’s worked on huge projects like YouTube and Second Life, and has the lessons to show from them. Chris Dixon Chris is not only a prolific tweeter, covering a wide range of interesting topics, he’s also quite the blogger. Drones + vision processing = accurate reports on number of protesters — Chris Dixon (@cdixon) His site at contains posts that largely read like an accelerated comments thread. By taking small pieces of a discussion and adding more context to them, Chris continues to drive conversations far beyond his Twitter profile.

May 09, 2018  New to Twitter? Sign up dcurtis's profile. Dustin curtis @dcurtis. Dustin curtis @dcurtis. The new MacBook Pro’s comically fragile keyboard has made me absolutely terrified of small crumbs. I was at the grocery store earlier and caught myself specifically picking out items that don’t produce crumbs. Dustin curtis. The latest Tweets from dustin curtis (@dcurtis). Dustin curtis @dcurtis 6 Apr 2015. Ping me if you want to hang out and learn about my new secret project. Given the absurd, senseless lineup of MacBooks, MacBook Airs, and MacBook. BuzzFeedNews tech reporter. One had even been hired by him to do work at his new startup. Dustin curtis @dcurtis Mar 22.

Dustin Curtis Dustin is one polarizing individual. But love him or hate him, his insights on the world of product are second to none. In the future, Facebook's most important product is Messenger. Google's is Hangouts. Twitter's is DMs. And yet all seem to be neglected. — dustin curtis (@dcurtis) From musings about iPhones to cooking, travel and more, he’s definitely worth a follow.

His candor is refreshing and his insight into the world of building products that people love to use is valuable for anyone in business. Janna Bastow Janna’s is a content sharer. She surfaces the absolute best stuff around the Internet and then adds her own comments as well. This is one of the reasons why Product Managers need to be sympathetic to their team when requests are made.

Via xkcd — Janna Bastow (@simplybastow) That’s not to say that she can’t throw down some knowledge of her own as well. While her style tends toward the sharer versus the pundit, Janna knows the business and can lay down wisdom when needed or requested.

Des Traynor What can we say about Des that hasn’t already been said? The guy’s no-BS approach to products, success, failure and the steps leading to all of them make him an absolute superstar. “We’re not solving the problem, we’re not even looking at the problem.” — Des Traynor (@destraynor) Just follow him.

You can thank us later. Mariya The founder of, Mariya is another great follow because of her ability to surface content that matters to all of us. How to Make OKRs Actually Work at Your Startup via — Mariya (@thinkmariya) Whether you’re building a product, thinking about building a product or just wondering if you should build a product, chances are good that Mariya will tweet something soon to help you find your answer.

Dustin Curtis On Twitter: New Twitter For Mac 2017

Julie Zhuo When you’re working for the the world’s largest social network, every task can seem huge. Enter Julie Zhuo from Facebook who brings the simplicity.

Dustin Curtis On Twitter New Twitter For Mac Download

New post: — Constraints are Hard, but please don't confuse that with uninspiring — — Julie Zhuo (@joulee) Julie has an amazing way of breaking down challenges into language that motivates without somehow ignoring the difficulty of the task at hand. On top of that, it’s generally not a bad idea to get a look at how Facebook does things and Julie is a direct line into the machine. Ryan Hoover Ryan has turned into a darling of the tech world lately. After launching Product Hunt, he’s joined Y Combinator, talked on stage at TechCrunch Disrupt and become the go-to guy for conversations about building. What Makes a Great Product Manager?, & others chime in: — Ryan Hoover (@rrhoover) What makes Ryan really stand out is his willingness to engage with his followers. Got a question or want to brainstorm an idea?

Chances are that Ryan’s going to make time to talk about it. Or in many cases he’ll go so far as to write blog posts about the subject that you brought up.

Mac

Ken Norton Formerly a product manager at Google and now with Google Ventures, Ken has great insight into both sides of the product and business table. Deciding to make last minute changes to my slides about mistakes may be its own mistake. — Ken Norton (@kennethn) He’s also full of self-effacing humor that does a great job of reminding us all to not take ourselves so seriously. That’s our list for now, but we’re looking forward to seeing it grow.

These are the product managers that we turn to for inspiration. They’re the ones who continually build incredible products, keep their customers happy and know how to keep balance through it all. Photo Credit.

Lately, Twitter's rule changes seem to draw a roadmap that consists of a bright red line. In its latest move, once again raising a hue and cry across the web and, yes, across Twitter. Behind it all is the same old question: what is the Twitter platform going to become?

Cutting off Tumblr was no surprise, it follows similar moves to block high-profile partners,. With LinkedIn, it seemed like a simple-enough story: Twitter makes money on ads, LinkedIn would siphon some of that revenue away by displaying a massive number of Tweets within its own network, and so goodbye partnership. Tumblr and Instagram weren't about displaying tweets, but instead access to the 'follow graph.' Why cut them off?

Twitter gave us a 'no comment' response to Tumblr, but it at least was slightly more forthcoming back when it cut Instagram off: 'We understand that there’s great value associated with Twitter’s follow graph data, and we can confirm that it is no longer available within Instagram.' Why doesn't Twitter just charge for access to the follow graph? With Instagram, it was easy to spin a story about how Facebook was in the process of acquiring it and Twitter saw no reason to help out a direct competitor, especially when Facebook doesn't allow Twitter users to find Facebook friends. With Tumblr, you could make the case that the represent more direct competition for Twitter, but that seems a little tenuous.

Here's a better question: why doesn't Twitter just charge for access to the follow graph? If Twitter was looking to build out its platform and monetize that platform, it seems like a natural-enough thing to try. As Chris Dixon asks: plenty of platforms have made $ w/o killing entire dev community. MS, Apple, game console makers, etc — chris dixon (@cdixon) In a different world, Twitter would have stayed open to all developers, big and small, and found a way to build an ad platform that utilized Twitter’s unique insights into users’ interests but still managed to stay open to third-party developers. In theory, at least, it would have the potential to be a new AdSense, an advertising platform with a deep understanding of its users that enriches both Twitter and its developers.

That’s the theory, anyway, but why isn’t Twitter putting it into practice? For starters, it's very, very hard to do such a thing well. As Yaron Galai points out: Gents- it's not as simple as display rules. Need fraud filtering, reporting, targeting on 3rd party clients,etc — Yaron Galai (@YaronGalai) Building out a full advertising platform that works on myriad clients and earns enough to pay everybody involved is very hard — perhaps too hard for Twitter to pull off. Still, building the next AdSense seems like an awfully good goal, good enough to at least take a shot at with a few key partners. No dice, though, and our only hint as to why is 'We understand that there's great value associated with Twitter's follow graph data.'

With 'great value' comes 'great responsibility' What exactly is this 'great value?' Who you follow on Twitter says a lot about you, it's the kind of demographic data that's could actually be insanely valuable. Compare it to who you friend on Facebook, for example.

I'm friends with old high school classmates with whom I have little in common and I'm frankly much less likely to follow a brand page on Facebook than I am a Twitter account: the barrier is lower. I'm also constantly tweaking who I do and don't follow on Twitter, providing the company with near real-time analytics on what my interests are on any given day. With Facebook, it's more about aggregation of friends than day-to-day culling. Twitter's follow graph contains the kind of information that Twitter could use to help advertisers better target me and it could potentially have 'great value' if Twitter could find a way to fully monetize it. With 'great value' comes 'great responsibility' and rather than face up to a platform's responsibility to share value with its partners, Twitter is choosing to block access to anybody that might potentially keep it from maximizing all possible revenues.

Back in June, when Twitter CEO Dick Costolo, 'What you’ll see us do more and more as a platform is allow third parties to build into Twitter,' it seemed like he was talking about APIs and client functionality. What he was actually talking about was money.

Twitter may continue to be a platform that third party developers can monetize, but only insofar as they build into Twitter itself, perhaps a bit like how it works on Facebook. That's, but at least in Facebook's case we know what the platform is. Twitter's new card system is still very much a moving target. The economics of how Twitter is dealing with its larger partners may be obvious, but before this most recent Tumblr drama there was the.

There’s no better way to talk about how Twitter regards its third-party ecosystem than to simply point out the chart Twitter published, a chart only an MBA could love: Looking at that chart, Twitter is discouraging apps in the upper-right quadrant, effectively signaling that apps that involve the combination of 'consumer' and 'engagement' are its domain. That's the official guidance, and despite Twitter's best attempts to discourage them, — hoping that the New Twitter will still offer the same opportunities that the Old Twitter did. Given Twitter’s repeated statements, it’s hard not to wonder if the is just a little Quixotic. Twitter isn’t building a platform business, it’s building a Twitter business This chart actually explains quite a bit more than you might expect. If you think about what both the smaller developers and larger social networks have have in common, 'consumer engagement' is precisely it.

Twitter isn’t building a platform business, it’s building a Twitter business. Anybody that takes away from that, be it a social network competing for ad dollars or a third party app with more than 100,00 users, is apparently a potential threat. Building a platform means sharing consumer engagement and Twitter's just not interested.

It seems to think that the traditional third party developer ecosystem is small enough to be pushed around without hurting Twitter., Twitter just might be right. If you’re wondering what kind of partnerships Twitter is interested in pursuing, it’s not a secret. The company locked up integration with both Mac OS X, iOS, and a. Creating a platform like Twitter is impossibly hard, but after years of fail whales, the company pulled it off. Monetizing a platform is harder still, and it looks like Twitter has taken the easier path: monetizing its social graph without sharing the wealth with the developers who helped build it. That's its prerogative, and without deeper insight into the financial imperatives behind it, it's impossible to know whether the company is being reactionary when it comes to access to the 'great value' of its follow graph.

CEO Dick Costolo once that Twitter wants to become a traditional 'media company,' but as it tries to wind down access to the platform, Twitter sure is acting like one.